Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us


Jump to your country or territory of interest


Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.


Submit news and opinion for publication


Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.


Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin

News from the Caribbean:

Back To Today's News

Letter: Why Bequia is a gem of the Antilles
Published on December 15, 2016 Email To Friend    Print Version

Dear Sir:

Majestic Admiralty Bay, Bequia

There is no better way to show that the completion and operation of Argyle International Airport (AIA) will do little to boost holiday visits to the mainland than to compare its current tourism numbers to those of Bequia, the first shining gem in our necklace of enchanting Grenadines islands.

Though it is only 9.3 miles (15 km) south of St Vincent Island (SVI), Bequia differs from the mainland in several important ways.

The second largest of the Grenadines islands at seven square miles (18 sq km) and with a population of under 4,500 residents, Bequia is miniscule compared to the SVI mainland that measures 337 square miles (115 sq km) and contains a population of some 104,500 people.

There are other differences as well. Though volcanic in origin like SVI, hilly Bequia is far less mountainous and has much less precipitation than the rain-drenched mainland interior, features which have encouraged the construction of the network of roads that crisscross the island that, in turn, has permitted the construction of luxurious villas all across the land.

Table 1. Foreign Tourist Visitors, 2015

Source: data available on request from the SVG Tourism authority

There are two even more critical differences.

Bequia has several fine (but not outstanding) white sand beaches along shallow and protected bays (Princess Margaret Beach, Lower Bay, Moonhole, Friendship Bay, Spring Bay, and Industry Bay). SVI has only three narrow mixed sand beaches (composed of pulverized white coral combined with black volcanic rock granules) along a tiny strip of land on the southeast coast at Indian Bay, Villa, and Young’s Island.

Lower Bay Beach at the south end of Admiralty Bay, Bequia

Second, SVI has a cruise ship terminal capable of berthing all but the biggest ocean liners and cruise ships. Bequia’s Port Elizabeth port has no such facility.

But there are also important similarities between SVI and Bequia that are central to their comparison. First, both are part of the united country of St Vincent and Grenadines (SVG). Second, despite an inter-island post-slavery variation in livelihood strategies (farming on the mainland and fishing in Bequia), both share a common history, language, and culture. Third, both are easily accessible by plane from international airports in nearby St Lucia, Barbados, and Grenada. Fourth, neither has an international airport. Fifth, except for the caveat mentioned above, both have excellent sheltered harbours for receiving most types of cargo and other vessels.

The fact that the mainland receives six times more cruise ship passengers than Bequia (see Table 1 above) minimizes the lack of a cruise ship docking facility at Admiralty Bay, a constraint felt especially by elderly or disabled holidayers reluctant to take a small, cramped tender to get to shore.

Holiday sailing craft anchored in Admiralty Bay, Bequia

Though the data in Table 1 suggest that the mainland had twice as many holiday visitors as Bequia in 2015, this greatly undercounts the unknown number of people – a figure that surely totals in the thousands, judging from the scale and variety of accommodation available on Bequia and the non-stop daily ferry service transporting visitors between the two islands -- who landed first at Arnos Vale before taking a ferry or other commuter boat to their actual destination in Bequia.

(Parenthetically, if I am correct, the grim 3,303 stopover air arrival figure for Bequia in Table 1 -- nearly 40 percent lower than those who arrived by air in Mustique -- composed largely of international tourists or business people, substantiates my claims in two previous essays (not listed below) that the construction of James F. Mitchell International Airport was as ill-advised as the building of a cruise ship terminal on the mainland instead of Bequia. This is because a terminal on Bequia would have attracted many more actual onshore cruise ship passengers than the Kingstown facility. This is partly because the 82,079 figure in Table 1 exaggerates by over 80 percent the number of passengers who disembarked, an assertion I will elaborate on in a subsequent essay. Moreover, a cruise ship facility on Bequia would have providing much more overall employment and revenue because its tourist-oriented shops, restaurants, and bars would have attracted many more non-cruising visitors year round.)

The attractiveness of Bequia as a tourist destination can also be seen by combining figures from the number of rooms listed in Ins and Outs of SVG 2016, a commercial publication commissioned and widely circulated by the SVG Tourism Authority, and those listed on other Internet travel sites including the metasite tripping. This calculation yields a total of at least 724 rooms in hotels, resorts, apartments, villas, cottages, and other facilities on Bequia versus 561 on SVI.

I say “at least” because many of the tripping listings, especially for Bequia, are private homes, apartments, and villas with three or more bedrooms. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that the occupancy rate of the Bequia rentals is much higher than their mainland counterparts simply because Bequia is a much better known and attractive beachfront holiday destination than SVI.

If I am correct, then there must be at least 1,200 rental bedrooms on Bequia, or over 60 percent more than the 750 number I estimated for the mainland using a more detailed analysis than presented here (see essay 36 below).

If these Bequia rooms are occupied, on average, only 60 percent during the year -- a modest figure by Caribbean tourist numbers -- by two people staying for an average of 14 nights, this yields 37,440 annual hotel visitors (1,200 bedrooms x 2 guests x 26 two-week periods x 0.6 occupancy rate), again highlighting that most Bequia tourists visit by sea rather than air, once more showing how ill-advised and wasteful the construction of the self-named James F. Mitchell airport has proven to be.

This figure also means that Bequia attracts nearly two and a half times more stopover tourists than the mainland in the absence of an international airport and the presence of Bequia’s underused and pint-sized regional airport.

What accounts for this difference in tourism levels between SVI and Bequia? This tiny Grenadines island has several good white sand beaches, plenty of upscale accommodation, little holiday-season rainfall, exquisite coastal scenery, lots of fine dining in hotels and stand-alone restaurants, some appealing art galleries displaying the work of local artists, a few handsome boutiques, and a long oceanfront walkway -- in short, just the features that discerning beach-loving tourists longing for a relaxing vacation are looking for, attractions that are limited on the mainland.

No wonder, then, that there was an official groundbreaking on November 8, 2016, attended by the prime minister, the Honourable Dr Ralph Gonsalves, and 45 local and international guests, of Firefly Villas, a Bequia Development Ltd project, which will see the construction of an exclusive collection of 39 beachfront homes starting at US$630,000 located on an approximately 15-acre private beachfront enclave at Spring Estate (Searchlight newspaper, November 22, 2016, p. 23).

A Firefly villa, Bequia

This is how the same Searchlight newspaper piece described Bequia:

“Located in the idyllic Grenadines island chain just south of St Vincent … Bequia … is treasured for its pristine white sand beaches, lush green interior, crystal clear turquoise sea that offers unrivaled diving and snorkeling and unhurried, tranquil pace of life.”

Everything that applies to Bequia applies even more to the other gems – Canouan, Mustique, Palm Island, Mayreau, the Tobago Cays, Petit St Vincent, and Union Island – in our charming chain of Grenadine islands, suggested that the keys likely attract at least four times more stopover tourists than the mainland, only a few of whom ever land at Canouan’s international airport by overseas charter aircraft from the United States. So much for the need for an international airport – something Canouan has had since 2008 -- to stimulate international tourism.

Secluded Spring Bay, Bequia, location of Firefly Villas

Meanwhile, we on the mainland must satisfy ourselves with three meaningless “air service agreements” with countries who citizens will never fly here and an alleged promise by a mid-sized Canadian construction company with no international experience, Pace Developments Inc., to build 50 cottages on 36 acres at Mt Wynne on lands that various government have been trying to sell, lease, or give away for over 25 years.

The burning question is why Bequia Development Ltd, hotel builders and managers with decades of international experience, much of it in the Caribbean where they already own and operate the luxury Firefly hotels in Mustique and Bequia that are “… firmly established as destinations of choice for generations of guests including rock stars and royalty [and with] a reputation for faultless hospitality” have never been interested in investing in a project at Mt Wynne/Peters Hope.

For an answer, ask Ralph.


This is the 38th in a series of essays on the folly of the proposed Argyle International Airport.

My other AIA essays are listed below:

1. Get ready for a November election in St Vincent and the Grenadines! But which November?
2. Lessons for Argyle International Airport from Canada's Montreal-Mirabel International Airport
3. Lessons for Argyle International Airport from the cruise ship industry
4. Lessons from Target Canada for Argyle International Airport in St Vincent
5. Lessons from Trinidad and Tobago for Argyle International Airport
6. The dark side of tourism: Lessons for Argyle Airport
7. Why Argyle won't fly: Lessons from Dominica
8. Ken Boyea and the Phantom City at Arnos Vale
9. Airport envy Vincie-style
10. Fully realising our country's tourism potential
11. Airport without a cause
12. The unnatural place for an international airport
13. The Potemkin Folly at Argyle
14. False patriotism and deceitful promises at Argyle
15. Airport politics and betrayal Vincie-style
16. Phony airport completion election promises, Vincie-style
17. Is Argyle International Airport really a ‘huge game-changer for us’?
18. Has the cat got your tongue, prime minister?
19. More proof that Argyle won't fly
20. Our very own Vincentian cargo cult at Argyle
21. The missing Argyle Airport feasibility studies
22. The world's four most amazing abandoned airports
23. Farming, fishing, and foolish talk about Argyle International Airport
24. Argyle Airport amateur hour
25. St Vincent's place in the world of travel
26. Investing in St Vincent's tourism industry
27. The Argyle Airport Prophecy: What the numbers say
28. Did the IMF drink the Comrade's Kool-Aid?
29. Why Qatar? Why St Vincent and the Grenadines?
30. Foolish words about Argyle International Airport
31. 'If I come, you will build it': Lessons from the Maldives for Argyle International Airport
32. City lessons for Argyle International Airport
33. Who really lands at Arnos Vale?
34. No ticky, no washy - Argyle-style
35. We have met the Vincentian tourism enemy and he is us
36. Hotel St Vincent 
37. Why St Vincent Island has so few tourists

C. ben-David
Reads: 6777

Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!




Most of you got what you'd wished, the Buccament Bay resort has ceased operations til further noticed. All of you probably rejoiced when news of this broke. Today for me, tomorrow for someone else.

C. ben-David:

Observer, who could possibly rejoice about such a tragedy?

Somehow people like you always want to shoot the messengers of bad tidings.

This is not my fault. This is not Peter Binose's fault or the fault of all those who have critiqued this government's crazy tourism policy, including the stillborn Argyle airport and the now shuttered Buccament Bay resort, a facility that will never reopen given all its debt and competing legal issues.

Indeed, we should all be grateful to Peter for alerting us years ago about what the judge in the Ames vs. Wilkins Kennedy case called "a scam."

Ultimately, whose fault is the failure of Buccament Bay resort? Certainly not the fault of Dave Ames who was simply trying to make a dollar anywhere and anyway be could.

And the people of SVG, through their democratically elected government allowed him to do so. The fault, therefore, lies with the ULP government -- especially its leader -- who did not do the relevant due diligence necessary for such a large project which would have shown that twice-bankrupt Ames had neither the expertise, nor money, nor credit rating (to borrow the money) to carry it out.

What Ralph Gonsalves wilfully allowed was for Ames to build a house of cards that has now come tumbling down.

Still, in your twisted mind, you somehow want to the lay the blame at the feet of people like me just because we were intelligent enough to recognize scams and deceptions when we saw them.

No wonder our Vincentian people are so backward.

Peter Binose:

I certainly never rejoiced but it was obvious it would happen I forecast it before it opened I even warned about what was going on and named all the players with their backgrounds.

It stood no chance with a house built for a ULP bigwig and car loads of cooked food going out at weekends. It was milked until it became dry.

But with deposits taken for 2000 units and only building 198 it had to happen because litigation is so great.

The project was started without proper due diligence being carried out. When the PM was asked about it he said "I do not expect investors to be angels."

Some of the best farmland was ripped away from the farmers telling them they were standing in the way of progress of the state, now is the time for tourism.

The land is a known ancient flood plain which has flooded several times during the memory of living man and should never have been built on.

Because of the players and the location failure was imminent even before it was built.

Who do we blame for this, certainly the PM must bear much of the responsibility.

The original Vincentian and the Barbadian involved in the initial project saw the writing on the wall from the earliest date and pulled out, the government did not. The government allowed the project to proceed fully well knowing that there were all sorts of problems which could bring SVG into disrepute, and they have.

Ames was promised an operating Argyle airport for 2010 and earlier, don't be surprised if he does not counter sue the government. Like Gonsalves, Ames is an eager and frequent litigant so expect the worst.

The site is now so blighted with adjoining land not even owned by the project and hundreds of shed like dwellings erected on that land by the developers it is unsaleable at real value. All of which now needs to be bulldozed because they are falling down.

So Mr Observer, if you were more observant you would know better than to make silly childish statements all the time making yourself appear a bigger fool than the readers already think you are.


You hypocrite chatting rubbish. Do you remember when the Building & Loan Association were going through the storm? NDP and their supporters took to the airwaves, blasting the government. But timely intervention by the ULP, they'd survived and is now a success story.

Buccama Bay, may be be under the waters, but thrust me they'll be back on their feet. This 'faker' called C.ben, believes he knows everything, when in fact all he has is an inflated ego.

Probably deported from either Canada, the USA, or the United Kingdom. Pretend PhD professor.

I will continue to defend the land of my birth.

C. ben-David:

My estimate is that the closing of the resort on Wednesday instantly reduced our mainland hotel capacity by over 13 percent, a real blow to our tourism industry since the resort did a thriving business for its first few years with a higher occupancy rate than many of our other hotels during much of the November-April winter tourist season.

A lot of people -- including Dave Ames himself, as Peter Binose suggests -- will claim that the failure to complete the Argyle airport was instrumental in the demise of the resort, an assertion its good occupancy rate without an international airport clearly shows.

More important, any sensible person who spends a few minutes perusing judge Coulson’s findings in Ames' suit against his accountants, Wilkins Kennedy, would quickly see that this house-of-cards resort and the entire Harlequin venture of which it was a part -- a dysfunctional enterprise that the judge said had all the hallmarks of a scam -- was bound eventually to implode regardless of where it took place. The only real surprise is that it took so many years to do so.

Peter Binose:

One of the things I never understood was why Ames on the say so of his accountant passed over sums of about US$50 millions to the Ice Group who were the building contractors. I call them contractors but they did not have a written contract. Ames did that without any contract or memorandum in place simply passed the money over to the Ice Group in big chunks, often before phases were complete, even upfront payments.

I would of told my accountant to piss off if he instructed me to do such a thing as give out money without any contractual terms in place. You can only blame Ames and ask what was he thinking of to do such a thing with Harlequin money when multi millions was and still is owed to investors.

I believe Dave Ames should be locked up for just that matter let alone whatever else has gone on.

I doubt much will happen to Ames in SVG because he is a danger to the regime and knows too much regarding who milked Harlequin. Like William Wise he will be able to run away without any local prosecution.

The VINLEC bill and the Tax VAT and NIS were allowed by this government to mount up so as they could grab the resort and liquidate it probably with a tame liquidator.

Its the only way that they can attempt to hide what has gone on including a number of contracts given out which may have been a sham to hide corruption.

Of course the sufferers will be the investors some of whom have invested their self administered pension funds in the project.

Like the NCB Bank the records will be what someone has in mind of hiding at Harlequin.

Readers by now you will all be aware that the twerp that calls himself Observer is an absolute halfwit.

I suggest you all take a look at the following articles to remind yourselves of what has gone on. The first one by me had in excess of 17,000 reads.'Building-and-Loan'-matter-contrived-to-take-our-eye-off-the-ball%3F-14539.html

Observer I am sure Gonsalves would like to wring you neck for raising this matter again.

C. ben-David:

Peter, the government of SVG could never make a legal claim against more than a tiny fraction of the Buccament Bay fiasco which suits Ralph just fine because it would allow him to say again that little or nothing of this has anything to do with him or his government. All of this is how the world capitalist system operates -- there are winners and losers and few of the losers are our own people who had jobs for years at Buccament resort as construction and hotel workers. Labour love, is all he will ever admit to, Peter.


As a result of our comments feature being overtaken in recent weeks by spammers using fake email addresses, producing a large number of bounced verification emails each day, we have reluctantly decided to suspend the comments section until further notice.

User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Other Headlines:

Regional Sports: