Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us


Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.


Submit news and opinion for publication


Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.


Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin

News from OAS:

Organisation of American States (OAS)

Prev    Next
OAS notes low voter turnout for Grenada referendum; Antigua-Barbuda to take different approach
Published on November 26, 2016Email To Friend    Print Version

By Caribbean News Now contributor

ST GEORGE'S, Grenada -- The electoral delegation of the Organization of American States (OAS) observing Thursday's referendum on constitutional reform in Grenada noted that, while preliminary results indicated that none of the proposed reforms were approved, voter participation and interest remained low, with barely 30 percent of the 71,241 registered voters casting a ballot, according to the Parliamentary Electoral Office.

Meanwhile, reacting to the outcome of the referendum in Grenada, Ambassador Dr Clarence Henry, head of the corresponding National Coordinating Committee in Antigua and Barbuda, which is due to hold its own referendum on replacing the Privy Council with the CCJ, said that Antigua and Barbuda is taking a totally different approach in terms of the question asked.

The OAS delegation, led by senior advisor at the OAS Secretariat for the strengthening of democracy, Paul Spencer, acknowledged the efforts of the authorities and various stakeholders in advancing the process of constitutional reform and commended the Parliamentary Electoral Office for the professional conduct of the poll and welcomed the peaceful manner in which the people of Grenada exercised their right.

The people of Grenada were presented with seven bills from which to make their choices, either separately or collectively. The referendum exercise gave them the option to either vote for or against one of the seven bills, some of the seven bills, none of the seven bills or all of the seven bills.

The Bills called on Grenadians to:

1. Amend the composition of the Elections and Boundaries Commission;

2. Amend the Constitution to ensure that a Leader of the Opposition is appointed in a situation where the governing party won all the seats in the House of Parliament;

3. Amend the Constitution to empower Parliament to establish a fixed date for general elections;

4. Amend the Constitution to ensure that Rights and Freedoms are accorded to all Grenadians. This Bill was considered controversial and ambiguous by many Grenadians who interpreted the phrase gender equality in one of the clauses, as providing an avenue for same sex marriages to be encouraged in Grenada. It is reported that the controversy that was caused by this particular Bill angered many Grenadians and prejudiced their minds against voting for other Bills;

5. Amend the Constitution to prohibit anyone from serving more than three consecutive terms as prime minster of Grenada;

6. Amend the Constitution to change the name Grenada to include the names of the other islands that form part of that territory and lastly, and

7. Amend the Constitution to replace the Privy Council with the CCJ.

Ambassador Henry said what was noteworthy about Grenada's CCJ Bill was that it contained other clauses in addition to the clause that provided for the replacement of the Privy Council.

The Bill also provided for the changing of the name of the Supreme Court in Grenada, it also sought to entrench a Code of Conduct in the Constitution to minimise corruption among public officials. It also made provision for public officials on taking office, to swear allegiance to Grenada and not to the Queen.

"What is further interesting about the CCJ Bill is that the electors were not given a choice or the option to vote for the CCJ and not for the other clauses or vice versa. The elector was either required to vote for the Bill in its entirety or don’t vote for it at all.

What this meant was that if the elector did not want to vote for the entrenchment of the Code of Conduct or for the change of the name of the Supreme Court of Grenada or for public officers swearing allegiance to the State of Grenada but wanted to vote for the CCJ he or she was not given that option. It was either all or nothing.

In that way, it is extremely difficult to conclude that the electors in Grenada voted against the CCJ. They could have wanted the CCJ, but did not want the contents of any or all of the other clauses to be included in the Constitution," Henry said.

"The people of Antigua and Barbuda will be asked one question in the simplest of ways -- should we replace the Privy Council with the Caribbean Court of Justice? There will not be any other Bills or other clauses in the Bill that will confuse or burden the electorate in Antigua and Barbuda. We intend to continue our educational drive in every nook and cranny in this country. By the time that the date for the referendum is announced every boy and girl, man and woman, irrespective of the age, class, colour, religion or creed, will hear about and understand what is meant by the words Referendum, Privy Council and the Caribbean Court of Justice," he explained.
Reads : 90031

Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!




This is exactly the problem. The bills were too loaded with clauses we the people were apprehensive of. The bills if presented by themselves will all be voted in. If The Powers That Be were to give the people a chance to vote on each clause or remove some of them they will all be voted in. But instead they presented only the main bills and deceitfully tried to get their "hidden Agendas" passed. Kudos to all the Grenadians that voted. The CRAC was not transparent at all but behaved like CIA operatives. They need to Rewind, EDIT and come again.

C. ben-David:

Let us pray that the citizens of Antigua-Barbuda show the same good sense that the people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Grenada showed in rejecting the efforts of the intellectual, political, and legal elite to fool them into giving up the last vestige of our historical ties to Great Britain, final judgement by the impartial and learned law lords of the Privy Council.

No educated or well read person in the former British Caribbean colonies could truthfully say that we have become far better off socially, culturally, or politically under "independence."

Anyone who disagrees -- except those who have directly benefited from the post-colonial exploitation of their own people -- need only compare the situation in their own "independent" nation with the situation in Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Monstserrat, Anguilla, British Virgin Islands, and the Turks and Caicos to understand what a folly separation produced.

Don't be fooled again by your elites, my brothers and sisters in Antigua-Barbuda, and continue to keep our poorly educated, incompetent, and crooked home-grown lawyers/liars on a short leash.

God save the Queen!


Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article. All fields are required.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, it will be a waste of your time typing your submission because we will never see it!

Your Name:

Your Email:

(Validation required)

Enter Code *


Prev    Next


Other Headlines:

Regional Sports: