Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us

Countries/Territories

Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.

Contribute

Submit news and opinion for publication

Subscribe

Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.

Archives

Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin
Instagram



News from OAS:



Organisation of American States (OAS)



OAS
Prev    Next
Commentary: Governments failed the OAS at its 46th Assembly
Published on June 17, 2016Email To Friend    Print Version

sanders_rodriguez.jpg
Sir Ronald Sanders (L) and Delsey Rodriguez, Venezuela Foreign Minister at the OAS General Assembly

By Sir Ronald Sanders

The 46th General Assembly of the Organisation of American States (OAS) was not a successful event. This judgement is in no way related to the government of the Dominican Republic (DR), the organisers and hosts of the Assembly, who did a superb job. The DR deserves every credit for demonstrating that one of the smaller and less well-off countries of the Hemisphere has the capability to meet international standards in conference organisation, including simultaneous interpretation in the four official languages of the OAS.

sanders10.jpg
Sir Ronald Sanders is Antigua and Barbuda’s Ambassador to the United States. He is also Senior Fellow at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London and Massey College, University of Toronto. The views expressed are his own. Reponses to:
www.sirronaldsanders.com
Satisfyingly, the failures of the Conference were not due to the 14 nations of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), whose representative showed remarkable cohesion in standing up for the sub-region’s interests and in arguing for the strengthening of the OAS and the entire inter-American system.

The theme of the conference was “Institutional Strengthening for Sustainable Development in the Americas”. The OAS is at the primary institution of the Americas; it is the only organisation that represents all the sovereign nations of the Hemisphere, except Cuba. But it is broke and unable to carry out the many mandates entrusted to it by its 34 member governments. That situation has been so for some time, and has remained neglected.

During my period of presidency of the Permanent Council of the Organisation from January to April this year, I made addressing the critical financial circumstances a priority of my work. Barbados’ ambassador, John Beale, as chairman of the Finance Committee, also did sterling work in trying to focus the attention of all governments on the urgency of rectifying the financial difficulties.

In my statement on behalf of Antigua and Barbuda in the plenary session of the Assembly, I said: “We are at a defining moment in the history of the Organisation of American States. My delegation is aware that that statement has been made in the past in relation to other organisations. But, it is a compelling reality for this Organisation, and it has all the urgency of now. Were the OAS a company, it would be declared bankrupt and put into liquidation. The budget on which it currently exists is a fiction. It needs $115 million to operate properly, but its budget is only $84 million. In effect, the budgetary shortfall between what the Organisation should have to fulfil its many mandates and its income on paper is $31 million this year alone. The situation is worsened by the arrears due by a few member states, totalling just over $27 million.”

I concluded the statement by saying, “If the OAS is to continue to deliver benefits for the peoples of its 34 member countries, its financial situation has to be addressed meaningfully and seriously.”

Regrettably, the majority of member states chose not to treat ‘meaningfully and seriously’ with this vital issue; the Assembly returned the issue to the Permanent Council, which has no capacity to commit the financial resources of governments.

Therefore, this dire situation of the Organisation will continue until June of next year when the General Assembly will convene in Mexico. What will be left of the OAS by then is anybody’s guess, since the secretary-general has to cut $14 million from the budget.

As I stated to the Assembly, “That draconian cut is in flagrant contrast to the theme of this general assembly. We are not strengthening the institution; we are weakening it.”

CARICOM countries can absolve themselves of any responsibility for the financial circumstances of the Organisation. Not only did they continuously argue for the issue to be tackled urgently, at the Assembly they also offered to increase their own quota contributions as a model for others to follow.

Why did CARICOM countries go so far? This was my explanation at the Assembly in the DR:
 

“The OAS is the only organisation in which all the remaining states of our hemisphere are members as equals, and in which we are able to address the issues that concern us individually and collectively. For a small state, such as mine, that is marginalised in the world because of our size and lack of military might and economic clout, the forum provided by the OAS is of immense value.

“Within the councils of the OAS, we can advance our interests through diplomacy and negotiation; by creating understanding; and by challenging misunderstandings and misconceptions. Again, for small states, such as mine, which are suffering from unfair trade practices by larger and more powerful countries, and whose economies are knocked by harmful actions towards our financial services, the development role of the OAS is extremely important.

"We would like to see that role expanded and strengthened.”

I concluded my statement on behalf of Antigua and Barbuda by stating that contribution to development “is the basis on which the peoples of our countries judge this organisation and the benefits of their tax dollars that governments invest in it. The Organisation must make a difference to gaining knowledge; to growing crucial sectors of our economies; and ultimately to reducing poverty and increasing employment. If the OAS is to remain relevant to people; it must deliver for people”.

Inter-hemispheric politics and rivalries between some Latin American countries, mixed with the wider geo-political interests of the US and Canada, contributed to the paralysis on this matter. Two countries owe arrears of contributions totalling $27 million – almost the total of the present Budget shortfall. Some countries won’t commit to increasing contributions until those countries pay up.

But, it is clear that three things need to be put in place without further delay to allow the OAS to continue to play its essential role of promoting peace and development in the hemisphere. Member states that owe arrears must make substantial payments; the contribution of each member state has to be increased; and the operations of the organisation have to be streamlined to make them more cost efficient and productive. There can be no cherry picking of elements of that as a single solution. Each is intertwined with the other, and together they configure the doorway to the continuation of the OAS as an instrument for good in our hemisphere

At the DR General Assembly, CARICOM countries apart, the OAS was failed by its member states.

© Copyright to this article is held by Sir Ronald Sanders and its reproduction or republication by any media or transmission by radio or television without his prior written permission is an infringement of the law. Republished with permission.

 
Reads : 11994






Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



Back...

Comments:

Peter Binose:

Its quite simple, name and shame those countries in arrears. Citizens of those countries I doubt know that their governments are not paying it is kept secret from them. So naming and shaming is a must.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines despite being led by a great 'I AM' with plenty of mouth and rhetoric owes money everywhere, but the people just do not know. Naming and shaming is so important to the people and they can then make better choices of who leads them. The conspiracy of silence by the other countries is a damaging factor to democracy and decency which is being whittled away day on day by the Marxist-Leninist's in our midst.

C. ben-David:

If the OAS disappeared tomorrow, would anyone other than its employees and hangers on notice the difference?


Back...

Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article. All fields are required.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, it will be a waste of your time typing your submission because we will never see it!

Your Name:

Your Email:

(Validation required)

Comments:
Enter Code *

 


Prev    Next

 




Other Headlines:



Regional Sports: