Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us


Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.


Submit news and opinion for publication


Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.


Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin

News from the Caribbean:

Back To Today's News

Privy Council says Bahamas wiretap law is constitutional
Published on April 23, 2014 Email To Friend    Print Version

By Artesia Davis
Nassau Guardian Senior Reporter

NASSAU, Bahamas -- The Privy Council in London has upheld the constitutionality of the Listening Devices Act, the legislation that oversees The Bahamas’ wiretaps laws.

However, the country’s final appellate court directed a magistrate to determine whether those wiretaps were used lawfully during an investigation of accused drug lord Melvin Maycock Sr. and four other men.

US federal prosecutors made a request in 2004 for the extradition of Maycock Sr., Trevor Roberts, Shanto Curry, Sheldon Moore, Devroy Moss and Gordon “Hog” Newbold to Florida for alleged drug trafficking crimes.

In May 2013, then Deputy Chief Magistrate Carolita Bethell ordered the men extradited to stand trial along with Melvin Maycock Jr, Lynden Deal, Bryan Deal, Torrey Lockhart, Laron Lockhart, Wilfred Ferguson, Derek Rigby and Carl Culmer.

As Bethell is no longer a magistrate, The Nassau Guardian understands that Senior Justice Jon Isaacs, who is hearing a challenge to the order for extradition, will investigate whether the limits of the wiretap authorizations were observed.

The judgment delivered by Lord Mance dealt with the constitutionality of the Listening Devices Act, as the evidence supporting the extradition requests were gleaned from telephone intercepts. Lawyers for the men say the wiretap evidence should be excluded because it was obtained illegally.

In a judgment delivered on April 17, the law lords considered several questions regarding the Listening Devices Act.

The first question was whether the wiretap authorizations under section 5(2) of the Act must provide (a) the identity of the person authorized to use a listening device to conduct an investigation into an offence being committed, (b) the date from when such authorized use of a listening device was given and (c) the offence that has been committed or that is about to be, or is reasonably likely to be committed.

The Privy Council ruled that these are all required.

It said the Listening Devices Act gave any authorized person or authority the right to hear, listen or record a private conversation at their absolute discretion or for any use without prior judicial supervision.

The court ruled that the Listening Devices Act satisfied a quantitative test in that it provides essential safeguards and protections consistent with the rule of law in a democratic society.

The Privy Council ruled that the powers given to the commissioner of police under the act did not violate the constitutional right to privacy.

Republished with permission of the Nassau Guardian
Reads: 2544

Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



No comments on this topic yet. Be the first one to submit a comment.


Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article. All fields are required.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, we will never see it!

Your Name:

Your Email:

(Validation required)

Enter Code

Please note that, if you are using an AT&T domain email address, e.g.,,, the verification email will likely not be delivered. This is outside of our control and the only remedy seems to be for readers to complain to AT&T

User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

The Caribbean Writer 2014

Other Headlines:

Regional Sports: