Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us

Countries/Territories

Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.

Contribute

Submit news and opinion for publication

Subscribe

Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.

Archives

Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin



News from the Caribbean:


Back To Today's News

Letter: Three signs why Grenada's home grown plan is crazy
Published on May 6, 2014 Email To Friend    Print Version

Dear Sir:

The $100 million IMF deal could become Grenada’s prime minister’s legacy or his albatross.

There is a story about a goodly gentleman who was in the middle of performing a certain excruciating task when he took it upon himself to solicit an opinion on his performance from his lone participant and unholy witness. The witness promptly replied that he was doing three knots.

The home grown economic recovery plan as outlined by the government of Grenada is currently doing three knots.

Not home grown

The words IMF and home grown are certainly incompatible. All over the world the IMF is known as the lender of last resort. This is the borrowers’ knacker’s yard. This is where you go when you have reached the end of the line with too many miles on the clock. When you have out conned yourself and you are cornered.

The IMF themselves recently described Grenada as a cancer patient.

They went on to also inform us that they have been treating the economically ailing island for the last ten years without success.

It is that lack of responsiveness to the treatment that led them to the conclusion that the country is in dire straits and does not possess the willpower to take its medication and get better. It was Dr Oz who observed that 90% of a heart patient’s recovery was based on that person’s will to live.

It was appalling to hear the government declare that at this point they have met several of the IMF targets. This must be misleading. How can one meet a target without starting the race? Are they telling us that the mere act of putting on your spikes at the starter’s blocks in a 400-meter race is meeting a target?

Not of the people

On one hand, is it the desire of the people to attain a debt service ratio of less than 60 per cent of GDP? Or loans and grants of $100 million from the IMF and other sources? Or a reduction in salaries from 70% of recurrent expenditure? Are these the objectives of the people?

On the other hand, isn’t it more disturbing that people are hit by a barrage of indirect taxes and direct income tax at the same time? Isn’t it more crucial that the population is subjected to one of the highest rates of electricity cost in the world? Wouldn’t it be nice to know that businesses on the island can be profitable again? Wouldn’t it be nice to know that the banks are friendly again? And that they start lending again? And that they stop sending people home? And closing branches?

And that when you have a property for sale it can be sold at a reasonable price?

Are the objectives of the home grown program in synch with the aims and aspirations of the man cooking by the road in Mount Rich? Can the plan succeed without including him? Can the plan succeed without creating sustainable employment for the unemployed?

Not a plan

The most ridiculous part of the analysis goes something like this: Do what the IMF says and we will receives over $100 million and we will be back to glory within three years. Well we have been down that road before. Even if we are allocated $100 million, we know that the vast majority of those funds go into non-productive exercises where we carry out a study of the last study with a view to commencing the next study.

One academic said that maybe they should tell us the results that they want to attain and then calculate the strategy towards working to attain that result. This makes sense, at least in that way we will all know the milestones that we are working towards and fully identify when we get there.

As it stands, there is no consensus on where we are going nor why are we going there. One thing is for certain, fifteen years of mismanagement cannot be corrected in three years. Jamaica, which started an IMF program over two years ago, is now realizing that it will take at least ten years to create a tangible economic impact and more like fifteen years to create consumable results.

Probably of greatest concern is the unalterable fact that the dictator at the helm of this economic quagmire will be an octogenarian in 15 years. Maybe his biggest desire is to feed us with hope and wish that we do not regurgitate on his watch.

The question is, are one hundred thousand people willing to take the risk and wait patiently for a non-existent reward?

Garvey Louison FCCA
 
Reads: 2113





Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



Back...

Comments:

Grenadianclass:

Keith Mitchell isn't committed to the structural adjustment program. Keith is just looking for some monies from the workers to advance his political agenda. He knows fully well that the structural adjustment program will fail. , however he is hoping yo get some Fred monies for politicking Keith legacy is that of failure and he knows it. He has ruin Grenada's economy and he should be held accountable. He should be charge for the abuse of power.

Grenada will only begin to realise it's true potential when Keith Mitchell is gone permanently. Keith is an ERROR.

Michael Julien:

A good article Mr. Louison! You have zeroed-in on the main issue: what are the targets being set and what is the strategy to attain them.

Having said that, I am reluctant to jump to criticizing the Government: At best, structural adjustment is an excruciatingly painful, slow and difficult task. So I can only wish the implementers "good luck" in their oversight of such actions. However, as I have noted elsewhere (and the IMF has also repeated), the missing link is the "growth strategy" needed to take us out of the quagmire we are in. Where is it and what are its essential ingredients?


Back...

Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article. All fields are required.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, we will never see it!

Your Name:

Your Email:

(Validation required)

Comments:
Enter Code



Please note that, if you are using an AT&T domain email address, e.g. att.net, bellsouth.net, sbcglobal.net, the verification email will likely not be delivered. This is outside of our control and the only remedy seems to be for readers to complain to AT&T





Disclaimer
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.



Other Headlines:



Regional Sports: