Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us

Countries/Territories

Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.

Contribute

Submit news and opinion for publication

Subscribe

Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.

Archives

Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin



News from the Caribbean:


Back To Today's News

Letter: Garinagu, reparations and CARICOM
Published on July 16, 2014 Email To Friend    Print Version

Dear Sir:

On December 10, 2013, CARICOM released a statement regarding the pursuit of reparations from former colonial powers. In the statement, it stated that CARICOM member nations would each “set up national committees on reparations, to establish the moral, ethical and legal case for the payment of reparations…to the nations and people of the Caribbean Community, for native genocide…”

The legal firm from whom they sought advice, the Leigh Day law firm from England, had won for the first time ever, a ruling for the case to go forward, in court, for Kenyans, against the government of Great Britain, for the atrocities they suffered during the colonial period, for torturing the Kenyans.

The key here seems to be they won a ruling to go forward in court for what occurred during the colonial period at the hands of the British. Armed with this reality it seems the Caribbean Community took that as ammunition for the fight for reparations for atrocities committed during slavery and to the native people of CARICOM countries, during colonial times.

The first reaction from Garinagu noted on social media website Facebook came fast and swift from a Garifuna organization called GAHFU, Garifuna Heritage Foundation. The reaction was not in support of the reparations announcement of CARICOM. Some days later the United Garifuna Association Inc. sent a public letter to the prime minister of St Vincent and the Grenadines Rt. Hon Ralph Gonsalves in support of the seeking of reparations by CARICOM with some concerns.

The concern noted by UGA Inc. was the fact that Garifuna who are exiled from St Vincent and the Grenadines and now living in Central America, namely Belize, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua and the United States, during the colonial period, were not consulted nor were they included in the reparations claim now underway. Last count they were numbering about 300,000 conservatively estimated.

Garinagu are the hybrid indigenous group who were expelled by the British after a second war from Yurumein, now known as St Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG), in the year 1797. Never enslaved, the European arrival to Yurumein/SVG met these free blacks there. They resisted colonial occupation until around 1635 when the French made a treaty with some of the Caribs (Garifuna) some historical accounts will tell. After being defeated, they were taken to the island of Roatan in present day Honduras by the British after their last leader and paramount Chief Joseph Chatoyer was killed.

Though some decided to remain in Yurumein/SVG, it was under the caveat that they abandon their language, culture their religion and their land. Basically slavery without being enslaved, though it is reported some were indeed enslaved. The Garinagu who were exiled maintained their language their culture and their religion but at the cost of their land being taken away, their economy broken, their way of life interrupted and at the cost of now living among societies that harbour resentment to them and living among governments such as in Honduras that are openly hostile to Garinagu today.

Garinagu kept their identity in exile but the foreboding dust of the exile of their ancestors is still settling upon them. They continue to suffer the results of exile by the British in 1797. They suffer from poor health, economic depression, and lack of educational opportunities and plenty of discrimination.

In the case of Belize, where they had once been the teachers of the nation, their test scores are among the lowest in that nation today according to recent national test score data. In Honduras, they barely have access to primary education and basic public services. In Guatemala, the government refuses to recognize them as citizens of Guatemala. In Nicaragua, they have some of the same issues. In the United States, many are undocumented and live outside of the financial system of that country in poverty conditions.

Yet the prize of the war with the British in Yurumein/SVG they maintain, although there is much pressure from the outside, their culture!

On the Leigh Day website is posted a ten point action plan proposed by CARICOM Reparations Commission and approved by CARICOM nations. Number three of that plan, seen here (http://www.leighday.co.uk/News/2014/March-2014/CARICOM-nations-unanimously-approve-10-point-plan-), clearly states that only about 30,000 of those against whom genocide was committed, the native Caribbeans, survive today from a one time high of 3,000,000. That number is erroneous unless, as stated earlier, CARICOM Reparations Commission did not take into account the 30,000 Garifuna in Belize alone and the other hundreds of thousands living in Central America and the United States.

In other words the Garifuna Diaspora, all of whom have their origins in Yururmein/SVG, was not considered. They number at least 300,000. There are other pressing issues not being acknowledged by any of the governments of CARICOM. For example, indigenous people have the right to self determination per United Nations Rights of Indigenous Peoples Declaration. They may or may not accept the idea if the CARICOM nation in which they reside will pursue the reparations issue on their behalf. They may very well form organizations of their own to pursue reparations against former colonial powers if they so choose.

With regard to descendants of the exiles to Central America, except for Belize, none of the other Central American countries in which Garinagu live is a part of CARICOM so by logic they can be eliminated as far as CARICOM’s reparations claim is concerned. This includes Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala and the United States.

In the case of Belize itself, yes, the Garinagu who live there are from Yurumein/SVG by way of Honduras; however, none of the atrocities that occurred against them occurred in Belize, so what will Belize the state claim on their behalf? In Belize, Garinagu settled in the south around 1801, which is only four years after the traumatic events that took place in Yurumein. One can easily conclude logically the state of Belize has no claim to make on behalf of the Garinagu living there but for the descendants of those who were enslaved? Yes! This leaves one option for Garinagu.

As established in the Mau Mau case, through a decisive ruling, former colonial powers can be ordered to respond to and answer for the atrocities committed during colonial times in a court of law. Looking at some of the options for Garifuna who are descendants of those exiled by the British from Yurumein/St Vincent with regard to reparations for colonial period atrocities, they stand a better chance bringing their own case against former colonial powers as their case is distinct from that of the CARICOM claims over slavery.

An example, there existed treaties between Garinagu and the British to respect the sovereignty of Garifuna people. Those treaties were violated by the British. There is the loss of land and territory and loss of sovereignty the Garinagu continue to suffer. The indignities they continue to endure as a direct result of the actions by the British at Yurumei/SVG is still taking its toll upon the Garinagu. If these can be successfully argued in a reparations case, it needs to be a task taken up by Garinagu as a nation.

This alone is ample reason for Garinagu, in all the nations where they exist, to assert their collective rights as indigenous people and work politically, socially and economically together, across borders, for their collective good. No CARICOM nation can represent those descendants of the exiles. No one Garifuna organization will be able to take on this task. They will have to work together under the umbrella of one central Garifuna organization working toward a common goal of winning such a case against the powerful British government.

With the ruling in the Mau Mau case the chances of the case proceeding in court is definitely improved. Armed with that ruling, the treaties that were violated by the British should be dug up and utilized. The ability to show loss of territory (Yurumien/SVG) and the atrocities suffered by their ancestors and the continuing effects on their culture and society, economy and spirituality that led directly back to the exile can be demonstrated, possibly to legal standard.

Garifuna should initiate a case for reparations separate from but working in tangent with CARICOM.

Joseph Guerrero
Garifuna Activist
 
Reads: 3286





Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



Back...

Comments:

PKnight:

At this preliminary juncture we cannot afford or encourage any division, we have to stick together as one people, one voice, one destiny. ST Vincent and the Grenadines position is clear on this Reparation matter; Pursue and settle the stolen land issue first, and let’s see what happens. And only SVG can bring this to the ICJ table at present. Meanwhile we welcome any support from Garifunas the world over, and also encourage them to organize and carry out their own plan of action to complement what we in SVG are doing at present, and hope to do in the future.

Joseph Guerrero :

It is agreed we should work together. The case of stolen lands must come from the victims. The clear victims are the descendants of those exiled. Had they not been exiled the and treaties with Garinagu not been violated. Those descendants would be on their own land in SVG. The case for stolen lands is for them to make. But I encourage those descendants of which I'm one, to work together with SVG. Absolutely!

Anatol Scott:

Anatol Scott

To: Pknight:

Do you actrually read and try to digest what other people write?

The main points of Mr. Joseph Guerero’s argument are quite clear:

1 The Garifuna in “Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the United States .... were not consulted nor were they included in the reparations claim now underway;

2 Chatoyer was “killed”, not assissinated;

3. “None of the .... countries in which Garinagu live is a part of Caricom so .... they can be eliminated as far as CARICOM’s reparations claim is concerned and .... the state of Belize has no claim to make on behalf of the Garinagu living there”

4 “The Garinagu stand a better chance bringing their own case against former colonial powers as their case is distinct from that of the CARICOM claims over slavery.”

5 “No one Garifuna organization will be able to take on this task. They will have to work together under the umbrella of one central Garifuna organization working toward a common goal of winning such a case against the powerful British government.”

Instead of digesting what Mr. Guerero has written and possibly accepting some of what he is saying, you seek to impose your view on him by insisting that “we cannot afford or encourage any division, we have to stick together as one people, one voice, one destiny.” Lo and behold! Mr. Guerrero is telling you the exact opposite.

According to you, “the St. Vincent and the Grenadines postion is clear on this Reparation matter.” I’m begging you to please accept that other people might not be as dog-headed as you seem to be on the matter.


PKnight:

Hmm! Now if this was Bro’Joseph Guerrero response to my comment, I might be inclined to respond. But the Bro’ seems to get my drift! Seeing its Anatol’s response to my comment, I flatly refuse to respond; a Bro’ in this struggle you are not Anatol Scott; one can tell from your “tone” of voice, past and present. You should be ignored. Don’t keep trying.

P.S
Part 1 and Part 2 of your commentary “Don’t mess with history” was a complete bore, but Part 3 was an absolute mess. On the whole all three were bad, very bad indeed, I had to stop reading. These read like the same nonsense we heard before, and a lot worse than Jomo’s, a lot worst!
You talk the talk of the colonialist, the neo-colonialist, the reactionary, and in this case, that of a conservative Negro; a “house negro to be exact”. Obviously you would be opposed to the Reparation movement, especially one coming out of SVG (Where else can it happen in this case?). Those in the field should avoid you as much as possible, and consider your contributions nefarious, nah’ traitorous.

Anatol Scott:

To: Pknight

I have no need to ‘suck up’ to anyone by calling them ‘Bro’ or ‘Comrade.’ Although you’ flatly refuse to respond’ to my comments, the bile in you still surfaced in a very enlightening response but, I refuse to let you or your kind lead me down a slippery, destructive, and uninformative path.

So! Thank you for the negative appraisal which displays so much more of your character than it does mine.

Towards the end of Part 3 of Don’t Mess with History, I wrote the following words:

“As I see it now, the problem in St Vincent and the Grenadines lies, not with slavery but, with what came after emancipation. After slavery, there must have been some affects that came into our cultural makeup that are holding us back”

I think that your reaction is testimony to a major part of the ‘affects’ I was trying to signal. In the 1960s, as I was wending my way through the murderous South of the United States, I refused to sit at the back of the bus. Then, as now, I’m quite ready to stand alone.

Anatol

PKnight:

To Anatol:

This is so very funny! You started out ready to pick a fight over the Reparation matter with Jomo and being ignored now you want to pick on me.
I have already concluded that you’re terribly against the Reparation movement particularly the one coming out of SVG, and so it’s very perplexing to me that you use the word “our” and “us”, as in “…After slavery, there must have been some affects (sic) that came into our cultural makeup that are holding us back”…whereas it should have been “my” and “me” all in reference to you Anatol Scott. You’re the one that’s been held back; by the way, did the economic system “Capitalism” ever cross your mind as the culprit that might be “holding us back”… as you implied?

Listen then, most of what you wrote in your commentary have a bias to it, as to be expected; you’re against the Reparation movement and all those who lend their support, what a shame. You’re worst than the “white slavers and their descendants”! They, like you, always supported their own interests, and when confronted are always quick to defend the “status quo”, or the “crown” with their lies, their sorry views and impetuous interpretations of historical events, with the outcry of, “Rule Britannia…” and as in Mr. Scott’s place, this one,… “Let me remind you that I have visited the archives in London, and France, in Alberta Canada, researched everything presented therein, and found it all to our (English) liking. And furthermore, the man at the University gave me a BA and even an MA, and with a pat on the back (nah’, a hand shake), he told me I’m an outstanding Negro servant, and said …“You Pass, you’re now an Historian”.
It simply boils down to this. You have added nothing complementary to this debate and from what I have gathered from your efforts, your contributions are refractory, and all be it “oppressive in characteristics”.

You hurriedly mouth off their views, their outlook, and as a consequence, assume their characteristics. What is the point then? In the long run, it turns out that most of them must be the greatest Liars in the World.’ But you believe them anyhow, and disbelieve or for that matter disagree, with Jomo and Beckles, and Gonsalves and the likes and scoff at the Reparation movement in such a distasteful and dreadful manner. And the real historical movement, the real movement going on before your very own eyes, exists someplace else for you.

Nevertheless, the actual historical movement that is taking place at present particularly in SVG, has the correct “praxis” (reflection and action) the correct method, the correct framework that brings to the fore the necessary fundamentals that answers to the questions on Reparations …whereas your commentary, lies with inaction is stagnant and completely useless.

In closing, Mr. Anatol Leopold Scott, “…Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under circumstances of their own choosing, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living. And just as they seem to be occupied with revolutionizing themselves and things, creating something that did not exist before, precisely in such epochs of revolutionary crisis they anxiously conjure up the spirits of the past to their service, borrowing from them names, battle slogans, and costumes in order to present this new scene in world history in time-honored disguise and borrowed language…” Shall we continue?


Back...

Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article. All fields are required.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, we will never see it!

Your Name:

Your Email:

(Validation required)

Comments:
Enter Code



Please note that, if you are using an AT&T domain email address, e.g. att.net, bellsouth.net, sbcglobal.net, the verification email will likely not be delivered. This is outside of our control and the only remedy seems to be for readers to complain to AT&T





Disclaimer
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

The Caribbean Writer 2014


Other Headlines:



Regional Sports: