Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us

Countries/Territories

Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.

Contribute

Submit news and opinion for publication

Subscribe

Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.

Archives

Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Travel


Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin



News from the Caribbean:


Back To Today's News

Commentary: Dialogue is the only path to take in Venezuela
Published on February 25, 2014 Email To Friend    Print Version

By José Miguel Insulza

The demonstrations in various cities in Venezuela in recent days have been impressive due to the number of people involved, unacceptable for the persistent violence that accompanied them and painful due to the loss of young Venezuelan lives, which we all lament.

insulza7.jpg
José Miguel Insulza is the Secretary General of the Organisation of American States (OAS)
They are not, however, new to the region. In recent years, in Chile, Mexico, and Brazil we have seen students and young people take to the streets to protest and demand solutions, other social sectors accompanying them, clashes with the police, arrests of leaders, and isolated groups encouraging acts of vandalism at the end of peaceful marches, distorting their intent. In Venezuela, too, there are real grounds for protest, including a dire economic situation, with inflation, shortages, and sharp spikes in the exchange rate or rationing of access to dollars. As all sides admit, the crime rate has surged.

Why then, does this confrontation bring so much violence? Why are so many who normally say nothing about other violations today calling vociferously for freedom and democracy and even demanding foreign intervention? Why are so many others, including the protagonists of protests in other places, now condemning the protesters and denouncing totalitarian intentions? What makes the crisis in Venezuela different?

Between this and other explosions of unrest there is one key difference: the protest in Venezuela is laying bare a political and ideological confrontation that is far broader in scope and is the real underlying factor. The protest marches have been countered by others in support of the government. The competing marches testify to splits among social sectors not seen on such a scale in any other country in America. The radical nature of the confrontation is evident in the stances taken by all those involved. And that prevents Venezuela from handling a situation that could be overcome, with the resources at its disposal, if the country were united.

The opposition talks of an attempt by the government to establish a "communist dictatorship" in Venezuela, to nationalize the economy and suppress democracy, respect for human rights, and freedom of expression. For their part, the government and its supporters claim that a "fascist coup" is being planned to overthrow the government by force and re-impose the old corrupt and unequal system. All agree on proclaiming their support for peace and dialogue but they exacerbate the conflict, some by calling for the overthrow of a government that was only recently elected and others by denying representation to an opposition that received a very large number of votes.

All want to win, to defeat the enemy. Yet the truth of the matter is that if one side wins society will remain irremediably split, for many years to come, between the conquerors and the conquered. This is not a struggle by many against a few; it is a struggle of many against many, all equally entitled to live and prosper in their country, regardless of their ideology or social position. Neither victory nor defeat is an option for Venezuela.

It is that division that explains the alleged ambiguity of governments, international organizations, civil society and other actors, who want to help but cannot find a way to do so. If they don't condemn the government outright, they are "cowards" and "accomplices." If they dare to utter the slightest criticism, they are "interfering in internal affairs" or "allies of imperialism." The attitude taken by both sides makes it harder for the international community to make a useful contribution to rapprochement and reconciliation. The initiatives they propose we should take would in fact add to the divisiveness.

That is why we have insisted so much on dialogue and will continue to do so. We think that it is possible to advance toward democracy, if room for real trust is generated, in which diversity of opinions is accepted, citizens' rights are fully respected, the quest for solutions is channeled through institutions that offer guarantees for all, and in that way an atmosphere of freedom and understanding is forged in which all can make a contribution.

The entire international community has called for dialogue and civil concord; everyone has called for respect for human rights and an end to the violence; everyone wants Venezuela to live in peace and is ready to help bring it about. They reject the disruption of institutions, while recalling the need to respect the rights of all and calling for dialogue and agreement.

But it is up to the Venezuelans to reach that agreement and to do so before it is too late. However, if there is no trust in anybody, no institution or persons that guarantee equanimity and fairness, perhaps resorting to outside players from our own region and appointed by common consent might constitute a feasible option.

Let us not forget that the saddest chapters in the recent history of some of our countries began with events stained by violence and intolerance, like those we are witnessing now in Venezuela, which opened wounds in our region that have yet to heal completely.

Let nobody expect the OAS to issue condemnations, deepen the divide, or reject legitimate protest. What people have every right to expect from us is unconditional defense of human rights, freedom of expression, defense of institutions, and the rule of law; not that we should label the Government a "dictatorship" or the opposition "fascist", because that is the language of hate, which serves no useful purpose.

Above all, what people can expect from us is a persistent, stubborn call for reconciliation, dialogue, and agreement, which is the only path Venezuela can take today. "Victory" may sound more heroic than "agreement; but agreement is the only way to go.
 
Reads: 5847





Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



Back...

Comments:

Paco Smith:

It is instructive to read the OAS Secretary General's perspective on this very important matter. He very strategically lists those he presumably sees as the principles involved, yet beyond "the alleged ambiguity of governments, international organizations, civil society and other actors, who want to help but cannot find a way to do so", that he so succinctly noted, Mr. Insulza tactfully did not acknowledge the significant role played by external forces who are hell-bent on using their hemispheric and global clout to undermine the democratically elected government in Venezuela.

To his credit, which I believe is commensurate with his years of diplomatic experience and the savvy that accompanies it, he extends an all-too-obvious disclaimer by stating, "Let nobody expect the OAS to issue condemnations, deepen the divide, or reject legitimate protest. What people have every right to expect from us is unconditional defense of human rights, freedom of expression, defense of institutions, and the rule of law; not that we should label the Government a "dictatorship" or the opposition "fascist", because that is the language of hate, which serves no useful purpose." This, of course, is 'diplomatic speak' which for those who are affected by the insidious elements at play, basically doesn't amount to a hill of beans. Nonetheless, that is par for the course in terms of today's international political economy, the current world order and how “diplomacy” is intertwined in the mix.

For those who do not submit their good, common sense to the well-prepared statements of such esteemed individuals, the OAS Secretary General's words serve as validation of the hypocrisy of democracy as practised by that organisation, when it comes to matters of this sort. I say this because if the OAS were truly committed to encouraging a viable way forward in Venezuela, it would entail calling a spade a spade and being quite straightforward in acknowledging that beyond the obvious players in the current, there are more nefarious elements in the background who are calling the shots by way of covert operations to destablise that nation's duly elected government. For certain, I would appreciate full disclosure, but in that vein, this is highly unlikely to occur, for the OAS, itself, is subject to the "influences" of that unnamed entity which treats Latin America and the Caribbean as though it is their personal fiefdom.

In any event, beyond acknowledging the significance of events currently taking place in Venezuela, it is important for Belizeans to take note, especially since it is the OAS who, on the behest of the Government of Belize, that is playing a considerable role in the farcical attempt to bring Guatemala's unfounded claim to Belize's sovereign territory, to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), for adjudication.

Belizeans and true friends of Belize, take note and become attuned, for this demonstrates the modus operandi of the OAS. Be both wary and leery of the path the GOB and its cohorts in Guatemala City and Washington, D.C. are attempting to take the nation of Belize. It is for this reason, that we have called a BOYCOTT of any referendum pertaining to Guatemala’s unfounded claim to Belize’s sovereign territory, which involves the question as to whether or not to take the matter to the ICJ. In the words of a tried and true Belizean proverb, "We must sleep wid wi own eye".


Back...

Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article. All fields are required.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, we will never see it!

Your Name:

Your Email:

(Validation required)

Comments:
Enter Code





Disclaimer
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.



Other Headlines:



Regional Sports: