Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us


Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.


Submit news and opinion for publication


Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.


Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin

News from the Caribbean:

Back To Today's News

Commentary: A (pro-)homosexual script: Those who oppose gay behaviours drive the rapid spread of HIV among them
Published on August 14, 2014 Email To Friend    Print Version

By Dr Lazarus Castang

Thanks, Jessica Joseph, for your response below my letter, Dr Lazarus Castang’s response to Colin Robinson. After examining your response to my letter, it is apparent that, like Colin, you do not provide a defence of morality, or of homosexuality, or of the morality of homosexuality, or of any natural right to homosexual behaviours. The irrational compulsion to remove anal sex from the homosexual menu through a study of both gays and bisexuals is unsatisfactory. Anal sex is not an un-homosexual act because some gays abstain from it and many heterosexuals engage in it.

Dr Lazarus Castang is a licensed psychotherapist and an ordained SDA Minister of Religion. He holds a PhD in Old Testament, a Masters in Psychotherapy, and has completed studies in basic medical science. He has ministered to several communities in St Lucia, Barbados and the US and has provided therapy to individuals, couples and groups. He is a graduate of University of Southern Caribbean in Trinidad and Andrews University in Michigan. He has written two theological books and several articles on social relations. (
Whatever two men or two women sexually engage in, is homosexual, and whatever male-female sexually engage in is heterosexual. Similarity of sexual or erotic behaviours whether French kissing, or oral sex, or anal sex, does not denude or strip the acts of the homosexual or heterosexual derivation. The study you referenced does not demonstrate that most gays are anal-sex virgins; it only suggests a degree of present non-participation by some gays. Moreover, the presence of bisexuals in the sample confounds the results you are using for gays only.

Homosexual practice (whether French kissing, oral sex, masturbation, anal sex, oro-anal sex) is not unnatural or immoral because of anal sex or personal distaste, but because male is not a sexual complement of male anatomically, physiologically and psychologically. Homosexual practice crosses the boundary of male-female complementarity into the discomplementarity of same-sex pairing.

The homosexual practice is against our human nature, our ends and purposes. It is a procreative dead-end. Homosexuality is a parasite on heterosexuality for the perpetuity of the human race. If exclusive homosexual behaviour is universalised, humanity will become extinct in the next 100 years. With such potential, homosexual behaviour threatens the very existence of humanity whether partially or exclusively practiced. The conditional contention that not everyone will become/is a homosexual, though true, misses this logical conclusion and fails to see that homosexual behaviour can be cultivated without prior congenital tendency. Moreover, the push for homosexual pleasure to trump moral virtue is hedonistic.

The argument that equates sterility or barrenness to homosexuality, which is a biological dysfunction/disorder, and at the same time hurry to say that homosexuality is not a dysfunction/disorder seeks to burn the candle on both ends and ends up in a logical crash. In barrenness or sterility, the complementary physical apparatuses meant for reproduction or procreation may be partly absent, or dysfunctional, or non-functional. But in homosexuality the same or discomplementary physical apparatuses, though completely functional, are never reproductive. Two penises, or two vaginas, or a penis and an anus, or a mouth and a penis or vagina, or a mouth and an anus are not designed at all to procreate or perpetuate humanity.

If the sodomy law is religious bias/bigotry, then the argument to repeal it constitutes a homosexual bias and anti-religious bigotry. The “consenting adult” argument cannot be used to justify homosexual practice and not at the same time be used to justify consensual incest, polyamory, male polysexual behaviour and bestiality. The convenient homosexual need to remain silent on moral virtue and talk about protection of rights, freedom and privacy seeks to conceal the immorality of homosexual practice within these broad categories.

The name-dropping assertion that “respected medical community” and “international human rights community” have the enlightened opinion on what constitutes or determines morality is unenlightening. Human reason grounded in nature is a base for human law by social compact. Mere hedonistic pursuits cannot be the base of law or morality. If the experience of homosexual impulses derived from physiological causation factors makes homosexual practice natural and requires the repeal of sodomy laws, then the experience of pedosexual (pedophilic) impulses derived from physiological causation factors makes pedosexual practice natural and requires the repeal of pedophile laws.

Consideration of other factors in the legal and moral approval of pedophilia necessitates the same for homosexuality; else the approval of the latter constitutes an obvious bias and a case of arbitrary law. The repeal or retention of sodomy or pedophile laws cannot only be based on the experience of sexual impulses. There is a clear priority of formal embodied structures of human existence over impulses in adult-child pedophilic relationship, and man-man and woman-woman homosexual relationships.

A clear contradiction in your writing is in saying, “Many gay men do not like it (anal sex) and do not do it as there are many other options to choose from to express intimacy, love and affection toward their partner” and then later on turn around and say, “the highest group contracting HIV are heterosexual women and gay male bottoms respectively -- those in the recipient role.” Many gay men do not have anal sex but the highest group contracting HIV are heterosexual women and gay male bottoms respectively!

Your contradiction is in the claim that anal sex is un-homosexual because many gays don’t do it but gays are a respective highest group contracting HIV through their bottoms. So the HIV epidemic among gay men is through their bottoms. Therefore, since there is an HIV epidemic among Caribbean MSM, and gays are respective highest group contracting HIV through their male bottoms respectively, then by your own confession there has been an increase, not a decrease or absence of anal sex among gays. Your argument shows that you terrorize and detonate yourself completely. You are the only victim of your suicide bombing. Not even the study you referenced provides resuscitation and resurrection.

There is also clear logical incompatibility between your irresponsible claim that other people are responsible for the HIV rapid spread among gay men and your assertion that what goes on in the bedroom between two consenting adults is no business of the state or other citizens. By the same token, gay contraction of HIV is no business of the state or other citizens, or the public. Their consequent healthcare needs are no business of the state or healthcare-providing citizens.

The claim for absolute and autonomous practice of sexual freedom without social, cultural, legal and religious norms or restraints makes gay men completely responsible for the pathological consequences of their behaviour. After their bedroom contraction of HIV, the public cannot be blamed for their continued sex that yields the same HIV result for other gay partners in their bedroom. Nor should the public be blamed for their bedroom or for homosexual retreat from healthcare because of bedroom shame, or moral condemnation of their bedroom practice, or their fear of the knowledge of HIV contraction, or their vengeful and deliberate attempt to infect sex partners if they are infected.

If homosexuals like heterosexuals make their bed, then they choose to lie down in it. In other words, they should accept the consequences of their sexual behaviour without alleging that other people make them practice more unsafe homosexual behaviours or make them less proactive to seek testing or find treatment after contraction. Moreover, any effort to strip a terminally dreaded disease (HIV) of the stereotypical/stigmatised ways in which it can be caught or is perceived, is an uphill battle that will continue to wallow in failure and frustration, if personal responsibility for one’s sexual behaviour is obscured by overt or covert public accusation.

Accusing the public for the deficient healthcare of gays is only legitimate in places where their psychological well-being is seriously endangered and their physical security and safety are definitely threatened in their quest for healthcare. However, obstruction of healthcare, though cruel and inhumane, is not a complicit or implicit public promotion of risky homosexual behaviours. In fact, if such context exists, then the public opposition that is intended to dissuade homosexual behaviours is terribly misdirected to obstruct their healthcare. It should be clear to the Caribbean public that there is absolutely no moral or Christian virtue in rejoicing in gay suffering, no matter how the disease is contracted.

Finally, the (pro-)homosexual script which says that those who oppose gay behaviours drive the rapid spread of HIV among gays is a mirage that effectively denies their personal responsibility, promotes the pathology of moral agency among gays, and supports the HIV/AIDS epidemic among men having sex with men.
Reads: 14940

Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



CJ :

It seems as though you think you are Gods representative on earth and your job is to keep causing trouble for the unfortunate citizens of this world who just happen to be born different. As an educated man Dr. Lazarus you should not be giving all those boring lectures on Morality what you should be doing teaching your congregation tolerance but I gather you are not a teacher but a boring lecturer whom for the better part put its students to sleep not to worry you are among the elited and educated of our societies I too had one of you in class I did not go to sleep though I just walked out and chamged classes.

As a christain man and a man with common sense ( my grand mother used to say Common sense trumps education not that she did not believe in Education she was a mid wife ) and i am saying now there are Educated fools I know a lot of them not that I am calling you are fool God forbid it is that you are one misguided soul forgive me if I sound forward having gone through the entire paper i can only say one thing you are so hateful no think about it you are a very hateful man and there are no rooms in God,s society for people with that kind of hate.

what you should be doing is getting together with scientist , perhaps doctors to see why people were born like they do in the first place as you rightfully say it is not natural it is also not by design do you ever stop and think about it well, i have only a few minutes before i read your article i sent an email to a very good friend of mine who happened to be Gay a went about doing mny business said a silent prayer then I said aloud God with all the technologies we have here on earth and we cannot find oput why people are born this way and as i opened up the news there you were again with all your stuff you are one boring man (forgive me for saying so it is my opinion).

Concerning Anus Sex it is quiet comman in straight men because most men like to explore it is always a part of most men thing it gives them bragging rights when all the boys get together. if you do your research with an open mind you will find also some girls of some cultures engage in Anus sex from an ealy age as they do not want to be branded as no good on their wedding night so you see the Gays do not have the monolopy on Buggery most every one is engaged in it .

Your tone in reading your piece also is telling me you do not know what skin you are in ( i could be wrong however, i do not think so) you need to do some soul searching , face your self and think What would your jesus do if he was on earth and please do not quote the old testiment to me . we need to have and show love and conpassion it is like a doctor giving you medication for some thing he knows nothing about in the first place.

Touching your HIV-Aids i know nothing more about it other than you do not have to be Gay to get that Virus wisdom should teach you things . You are a teacher what ministers do is to teach and to lay blame on others feet teach by example of Jesus Christ and stop putting others against other citizens it is not the fear of you we want in our society it is the love and understanding , tolerance and respect for our fellow men Dr. Lazarus start doing the work of your God in a meaning ful way pray and fast from what i understnd he will guide you listen to that still soft voice no school of higher learning will tech you God,s ways only you with a little common sense can rule the day .

Get off your high Moral compas and stop spreading hate throughout the Caribbean the citizens were born that way try and get together with others to see why this is like it is Do you think these people want to belike that I do not think so and you should start thinking that also ( you know your bilble every one have sin and ome short of the Glory of God ) if these unfortunate brothers and sisters are committing a sin it is not your sin you have no right to condem them to death and you folks talk about God where I am not sure what God you serve but I serve the God of Abraham through Jesus Christ and according to the word Jesus was a man of compassion not like the God you know that was only for one people the people that killed all his prophets( but this is another topic now they are claming East and West Jerusalemande the Christians of thsi world are standing by and allowing them to do you like you are doing to these gays)

The words are love , tolerance and understanding think on these onder them in your hearts.


Lazarus Castang:

Hi CJ,

Thanks for your courage to write your opposing piece pushing love, tolerance and understanding of homosexuals and homosexual behaviour as churchlike, godly and moral. I will cut through your rant and self-manufactured ideas about my commentary to say:

(1) Moral opposition to homosexual behaviour is not the same as hatred for homosexuals. In like manner, your opposition to my opposition does not mean that you hate me.

(2) No one is born having homosex. People are born with tendencies to homosexual and/or heterosexual behaviour.

(3) Deep seated tendencies, whether inherited or cultivated, are not a reason for their social and moral acceptance. If this is the case, then are you accepting of incest and pedophilia?

You sound like a church person having mentioned God about 9 times and Jesus about 3 times, but unfortunately you have said nothing about the will of God as contained in his Word. Your writing judges my opposition to homosexual behaviour as more offensive to you than homosexual behaviour. God loves those who think they are oke as well as those society look down upon. His love forgives sin, not condones it. Please take some time out and see what the Word says about homosexual behaviour.

Dr Lazarus Castang


As a result of our comments feature being overtaken in recent weeks by spammers using fake email addresses, producing a large number of bounced verification emails each day, we have reluctantly decided to suspend the comments section until further notice.

User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Other Headlines:

Regional Sports: