Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us

Countries/Territories

Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.

Contribute

Submit news and opinion for publication

Subscribe

Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.

Archives

Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin



News from the Caribbean:


Back To Today's News

Commentary: 2013: A year of lost opportunities for Caribbean countries
Published on December 27, 2013 Email To Friend    Print Version

By Sir Ronald Sanders

2013 was not a good year for any of the 14 independent member states of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) – not even for three of the four commodity-exporting nations Belize, Guyana and Suriname, despite their economic growth. The fourth commodity-exporting country, Trinidad and Tobago, had no growth to speak of.

sanders6.jpg
Sir Ronald Sanders is a Consultant and Senior Research Fellow at London University. Reponses to:
www.sirronaldsanders.com
All the countries were beset by high unemployment; there was high debt in 10 of them; decline in inclusive economic growth in 11 of them; unsustainable fiscal deficits and widening trade deficits in goods and services in all of them; and foreign exchange losses in many of them. Additionally, bank lending and private spending tightened in 11 of them causing a contraction in the private sector to which all countries had been looking to lead economic recovery in the wake of cash-strapped governments being compelled to retreat as both investor and employer.

Underlying all this in every CARICOM country there was (and is) an insistence by governments to seek only national solutions even though there is great bewilderment about what national measures could be taken to improve the economic situation. Bewilderment led to inaction, as governments failed to engage meaningfully with other crucial actors in their countries, such as the opposition political parties, the trade unions, the private sector, and the universities, to develop an agreed national plan to help take their economies out of a prolonged stagnation. Throughout 2013 there was a pervading atmosphere of “not knowing what to do”. In this climate, those governments in IMF programmes did what the IMF said they should, and so too did the governments whose circumstances brought them to the IMF’s door. But, IMF-inspired measures focus on austerity measures such as job losses and wage freezes that heighten economic contraction.

Of course, national solutions must be sought, and they would best be sought within a framework of genuine dialogue and engagement with all the important players in the country’s economic fortunes. To do this, important hurdles have to be jumped including – and especially for Guyana where the two opposition parties command a majority in parliament – the sincere and constructive involvement of opposition political parties.

It is dangerous for CARICOM countries to assume that their problems will be solved by the full resolution of the economic crisis in North America and European Union (EU) countries. While there is recovery in both places, the proportion of wages in national income in the US and the major EU countries has declined in real terms, leading to contraction in spending. For the Caribbean, this translates into fewer tourists or tourists who spend less. It has also been difficult for investors to locate money in the North American and European capital markets for investment in the Caribbean unless projects are high-yielding, such as gold mining, or they get exceedingly generous tax holidays and other concessions that may not benefit the economies in the long-run.

In this circumstance, not only are the benefits in terms of tourism and investment likely to take longer to “trickle down” to CARICOM economies, but the global economic environment is far less favourable than before the recession started in late 2008. As an example of this, China’s economy, which grew at an average 9.5% for the decade 2001 to 2011, declined in 2012 to 7.8% and looks likely to be 7.6% in 2013. China’s appetite for commodities is already decreasing, pushing down prices paid to commodity-exporting countries, including those in CARICOM. What is more, since loans that CARICOM governments have contracted with China are denominated in yuan, which is rising in value against the US dollar, repayments will escalate, placing a bigger burden on already dwindling government revenues.

CARICOM countries also embraced a full Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the EU in 2008. A limited review of the EU-Caribbean EPA is said to be taking place now to determine whether it has delivered on its promises. It would have been wise of governments to involve all trade unions, private sector, political parties, and academia in a transparent review that fully advises the public of findings. That has not happened. But, the region should fully review the EPA, which, so far, has not delivered promised market access for Caribbean goods and services, and has not realised any significant new investment. Further, the EPA will lead in all Caribbean countries to a reduction in government revenues as a consequence of the removal of tariffs on goods imported from EU countries. To replace such lost revenue, governments will have to increase taxes on their own people at a time when taxation is already burdensome.

Caribbean governments, collectively, should be calling for at least the suspension of the terms of the EPA until the countries of the region can restructure and re-align their economies collectively with national plans that are integrated with a regional integration strategy. For it remains a stark reality that none of the CARICOM countries on its own – including those that now benefit from commodity exports – can deliver on a sustained basis the economic benefits, physical infrastructure and social systems their people urgently need. The EU knows this reality very well, but it is most unlikely to suspend the EPA unless there is certainty that national restructuring by CARICOM states will indeed be integrated in a regional development framework.

So, while the present difficulties of CARICOM countries require national solutions that are genuinely “national”, such national solutions will not be enough; notwithstanding the unsubstantiated belief by some parochially-minded groups that their small economies can miraculously succeed and thrive on their own.

In previous commentaries I have pointed to three critical areas that require regional attention and that could have a beneficial impact on the economies of all. They are: regional food production and distribution, maritime transportation and energy production and distribution. These are regional solutions that should be addressed on a parallel track with national plans. They are not mutually exclusive.

CARICOM governments failed to grasp this reality, and 2013 became a lost opportunity. In practical terms, this means that CARICOM must go beyond occasional cooperation. The New Year must see a concerted effort to examine how regional action can help national survival. This requires a stronger institutional base for CARICOM than it now has, as well as a change of mindset and a will to act regionally. It is not enough to wait for global economic circumstances to improve; reliance on mere trickle down is a fool’s hope.

The New Year can be a year of improved prospects if CARICOM governments end the ‘pause’ they applied to economic integration in May 2011.
 
Reads: 10233





Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



Back...

Comments:

Fr. Sean Major-Campbell:

This is an extremely valuable and sobering reflection. Will our Caribbean leaders and peoples listen? I see a coin with one side of hope and possibilities, and the other side with pain and confusion! Which will we promote? I really found this article to be excellent. Thank you.

andrew allen:

The Bahamas has spent the last four years of worldwide gloom (our economy grew 1.9 percent in 2013) by building a new airport, upgrading roads, ports and infrastructure and completing (to open in december 2014) Baha Mar, the largest resort development in the hemisphere. It has commenced direct air linkages from Panama, successfully concluded visa exemption talks with China and is pursing direct air linkages from Beijing to Nassau.

Whatever else has been happening in the region, it is clear that we are in very good shape to surge economically, a process that has already begun.

Sanders speaks of the region as if it were one country and so misses much of the diversity of policies and outcomes.

gersham Alexander:

The problem affecting the Caribbean economies is one of management. We cannot manage our food production properly. We import clothing and textiles, fruits, sugar, vegetables, rice and meat products into the region. These commodities could be produced regionally and would create hundreds of jobs for our people. Basdeo Jagdeo, a former president of Guyana once called for food security in the region. This was done at the Caricom level. We need to work together as an economic bloc in order to generate the synergetic energy needed to propel us forward, ecomomically, as a region. Selfishness would not help. It is no longer to each his own. We need to come together to chart us course as a region. Let us not blame our colonial masters. They gave us two ships(Federal palm and Federal mason) and two airlnes which connected the region. Please correct me if I am wrong. Our leaders are not proactive. They are afraid to of new innovations. They would not even try renewable energy which exists in abundance. Solar, wind, sea tide and of course our rivers. It is our leaders 'petitness' that retard development at times. One political party would start a project and the opposition party would not continue the project if they are elected into office. what a shame?

Our leaders need to put into action plans and programmes which would start the developmental process.


Back...

Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article. All fields are required.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, we will never see it!

Your Name:

Your Email:

(Validation required)

Comments:
Enter Code



Please note that, if you are using an AT&T domain email address, e.g. att.net, bellsouth.net, sbcglobal.net, the verification email will likely not be delivered. This is outside of our control and the only remedy seems to be for readers to complain to AT&T





Disclaimer
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.



Other Headlines:



Regional Sports: