Caribbean News Now!

About Us Contact Us

Countries/Territories

Jump to your country or territory of interest

Advertise with us

Reach our daily visitors from around the Caribbean and throughout the world. Click here for rates and placements.

Contribute

Submit news and opinion for publication

Subscribe

Click here to receive our daily regional news headlines by email.

Archives

Click here to browse our extensive archives going back to 2004

Also, for the convenience of our readers and the online community generally, we have reproduced the complete Caribbean Net News archives from 2004 to 2010 here.

Climate Change Watch

The Caribbean is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels brought about by global warming. Read the latest news and information here...

Follow Caribbean News Now on Twitter
Connect with Caribbean News Now on Linkedin



News from the Caribbean:


Back To Today's News

CCJ Corner: CCJ resolves family battle
Published on June 11, 2014 Email To Friend    Print Version

The Caribbean Court of Justice continues to demonstrate that it is here to serve the people of the region even in instances where families have been unable to resolve their own conflicts. One such instance is seen in the Guyanese case of Aslim Sheermohamed v Azeez Sheermohammed [2011] CCJ 8 (AJ).

This case concerns the attempt of members of a family to gain control of the family company, S.A. Nabi & Sons Limited. In November 2004, Aslim, the Appellant, brought legal action against his brother Azeez and his nephew Affron following their appointment as directors of the family company in a meeting convened by his brother, Amin. This meeting was held the day after Aslim declared that his son, Ashmin, was the elected director of the company. Consequently, Aslim challenged the validity of Amin’s meeting and the decisions that flowed from it.

The High Court judge deciding the matter was required to give effect to section 135(5) of the Companies Act. This section provides that, where a shareholder has requested the directors of a company to convene a meeting and the directors fail to do so within 21 days of the request and to hold the meeting within 28 days of convening it, that shareholder may himself convene a meeting of the shareholders.

The judge considered that Amin served a request on the directors of the company but he proceeded to convene his meeting before the expiration of the 21 days.

As a result, the judge found, the meeting was unlawful and invalid and Affron’s and Azeez’s appointments were invalid. The Court of Appeal, however, found that the premature convening of the meeting did not invalidate the appointments, as the directors eventually did not convene the meeting at all. Unhappy with the Court of Appeal’s decision, Aslim appealed to the CCJ.

The Court carefully evaluated the provisions of section 135 of the Companies Act, noted the policy considerations applicable and then declared the correct interpretation and application of the section in the present case. It found that Amin’s meeting was invalid as it was convened prematurely, regardless of the omission of the directors to act in the end.

The order of the High Court judge was reinstated and the Court ultimately resolved the family dispute.
 
Reads: 1634





Click here to receive daily news headlines from Caribbean News Now!



Back...

Comments:

MC D Dixon:

This is no big thing. The CCJ is doing its work as the final appellate body for Guyana and not as interpreter of the RTC. As the final appellate body it is expected to hear matters refered from the Courts Below once there are grounds for appeal.


Back...

Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article. All fields are required.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, we will never see it!

Your Name:

Your Email:

(Validation required)

Comments:
Enter Code



Please note that, if you are using an AT&T domain email address, e.g. att.net, bellsouth.net, sbcglobal.net, the verification email will likely not be delivered. This is outside of our control and the only remedy seems to be for readers to complain to AT&T





Disclaimer
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment author and are not representative of Caribbean News Now or its staff. Caribbean News Now accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Caribbean News Now reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments. Any content that is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will not be approved.
Before posting, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.



Other Headlines:



Regional Sports: